Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Social Science Computer Review
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Reviews

Book Reviews : Quantitative Methods for Historians: A Guide to Research, Data, and Statistics Konrad H. Jarausch and Kenneth A. HardyPublisher: University of North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill, NC Year of Publication: 1990 Length: 250 pages Price: $37.50 cloth, $11.95 paper

This book represents an effort to provide a contemporary replacement for the pioneering texts of quantitative history published 2 decades ago. The authors address themselves to a number of purposes that are not easily combined in a single volume. Their initial objectives are expostulated in the beginning and ending chapters, apparently revised and translated from the original German work of Jarausch. These objectives are (i) to define the place and improve the practice of quantitative and computer-based approaches in contemporary historical research and (2) to reach out with a message of methodological moderation both to quantifiers and to their traditional opponents who adhere to hermeneutic approaches. To pursue these objectives, the authors find it necessary to defend, in a noncombative way, the integrity of quantitative history in the face of the onslaughts of traditionalists and the newer attacks of deconstructionist, radical, feminist, and other "post- modern" critics of quantification in history and, indeed, in the social sciences at large.

Social Science Computer Review, Vol. 10, No. 3, 432-434 (1992)
DOI: 10.1177/089443939201000331


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?