Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Social Science Computer Review
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cho, H.
Right arrow Articles by Larose, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Privacy Issues in Internet Surveys

Hyunyi Cho

Emerson College, hcho{at}emerson.edu

Robert Larose

Michigan State University, larose{at}pilot.msu.edu

Surveys administered over the Internet have been plagued by low response rates and at times have provoked respondent rebellions against researchers who stand accused of broadcasting noxious unwanted e-mail or "spam." This article examines the issue from the perspective of social science research on privacy in an effort to understand the unique privacy context of Internet-based survey research. Online surveyors commit multiple violations of physical, informational, and psychological privacy that can be more intense than those found in conventional survey methods. Internet surveys also invade the interactional privacy of online communities, a form of privacy invasion seldom encountered with traditional survey methods. The article concludes with recommendations for improving response rates to online surveys using accepted privacy protection practices already found on the Internet as well as emerging Internet technologies.

Key Words: Internet • survey • privacy • response rate • sampling

Social Science Computer Review, Vol. 17, No. 4, 421-434 (1999)
DOI: 10.1177/089443939901700402


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
The Counseling PsychologistHome page
C. C. Sammons and S. L. Speight
A Qualitative Investigation of Graduate-Student Changes Associated With Multicultural Counseling Courses
The Counseling Psychologist, August 1, 2008; 36(6): 814 - 838.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Organizational Research MethodsHome page
L. Foster Thompson and E. A. Surface
Employee Surveys Administered Online: Attitudes Toward the Medium, Nonresponse, and Data Representativeness
Organizational Research Methods, April 1, 2007; 10(2): 241 - 261.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Travel ResearchHome page
J. Kelly, W. Haider, and P. W. Williams
A Behavioral Assessment of Tourism Transportation Options for Reducing Energy Consumption and Greenhouse Gases
Journal of Travel Research, February 1, 2007; 45(3): 297 - 309.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Family IssuesHome page
S. Tang and X. Dong
Parents' and Children's Perceptions of Privacy Rights In China: A Cohort Comparison
Journal of Family Issues, March 1, 2006; 27(3): 285 - 300.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Public Opin QHome page
D. Heerwegh
Effects of Personal Salutations in E-mail Invitations to Participate in a Web Survey
Public Opin Q, December 1, 2005; 69(4): 588 - 598.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Family and Consumer Sciences Research JournalHome page
A. C. Lyons, B. Cude, F. C. Lawrence, and M. Gutter
Conducting Research Online: Challenges Facing Researchers in Family and Consumer Sciences
Family and Consumer Sciences Research Journal, June 1, 2005; 33(4): 341 - 356.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Social Science Computer ReviewHome page
A. R. Trouteaud
How You Ask Counts: A Test of Internet-Related Components of Response Rates to a Web-Based Survey
Social Science Computer Review, August 1, 2004; 22(3): 385 - 392.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Organizational Research MethodsHome page
J. M. Stanton
Book Review
Organizational Research Methods, January 1, 2004; 7(1): 115 - 118.
[PDF]


Home page
AssessmentHome page
R. T. Fouladi, C. J. Mccarthy, and Naomip. Moller
Paper-and-Pencil Or Online?: Evaluating Mode Effects on Measures of Emotional Functioning and Attachment
Assessment, June 1, 2002; 9(2): 204 - 215.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Health Educ ResHome page
S. S. Bull, M. McFarlane, and D. King
Barriers to STD/HIV prevention on the Internet
Health Educ. Res., December 1, 2001; 16(6): 661 - 670.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Organizational Research MethodsHome page
J. M. Stanton and S. G. Rogelberg
Using Internet/Intranet Web Pages to Collect Organizational Research Data
Organizational Research Methods, July 1, 2001; 4(3): 200 - 217.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Organizational Research MethodsHome page
Z. Simsek and J. F. Veiga
A Primer on Internet Organizational Surveys
Organizational Research Methods, July 1, 2001; 4(3): 218 - 235.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Educational and Psychological MeasurementHome page
R. C. Arnau, R. L. Thompson, and C. Cook
Do Different Response Formats Change the Latent Structure of Responses? an Empirical Investigation Using Taxometric Analysis
Educational and Psychological Measurement, February 1, 2001; 61(1): 23 - 44.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Social Science Computer ReviewHome page
D. O'Neil
Analysis of Internet Users' Level of Online Privacy Concerns
Social Science Computer Review, February 1, 2001; 19(1): 17 - 31.
[Abstract] [PDF]