|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
Web SurveysPerceptions of Burden
Scott D. Crawford
MSInteractive, scott.crawford{at}ms-interactive.com
Mick P. Couper
University of Michigan
Mark J. Lamias
University of Michigan
Web surveys appear to be attaining lower response rates than equivalent mail surveys. One reason may be that there is currently little information on effective strategies for increasing response to Internet-based surveys. Web users are becoming more impatient with high-burden Web interactions. The authors examined the decision to respond to a Web survey by embedding a series of experiments in a survey of students at the University of Michigan. A sample of over 4,500 students was sent an e-mail invitation to participate in a Web survey on affirmative action policies. Methodological experiments included using a progress indicator, automating password entry, varying the timing of reminder notices to nonrespondents, and using a prenotification report of the anticipated survey length. Each of these experiments was designed to vary the burden (perceived or real) of the survey request. Results of these experiments are presented.
Key Words: Websurveys surveymethodology Internet affirmativeaction onlinesurveys
Social Science Computer Review, Vol. 19, No. 2,
146-162 (2001)
DOI: 10.1177/089443930101900202

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Galesic and M. Bosnjak
Effects of Questionnaire Length on Participation and Indicators of Response Quality in a Web Survey
Public Opin Q,
June 1, 2009;
73(2):
349 - 360.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
W. Vandenabeele
The mediating effect of job satisfaction and organizational commitment on self-reported performance: more robust evidence of the PSM--performance relationship
International Review of Administrative Sciences,
March 1, 2009;
75(1):
11 - 34.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
V. Toepoel, C. Vis, M. Das, and A. van Soest
Design of Web Questionnaires: An Information-Processing Perspective for the Effect of Response Categories
Sociological Methods Research,
February 1, 2009;
37(3):
371 - 392.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
N. Malhotra
Completion Time and Response Order Effects in Web Surveys
Public Opin Q,
December 23, 2008;
(2008)
nfn050v2.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. A. Klofstad, S. Boulianne, and D. Basson
Matching the Message to the Medium: Results from an Experiment on Internet Survey Email Contacts
Social Science Computer Review,
November 1, 2008;
26(4):
498 - 509.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T.-H. Shih and Xitao Fan
Comparing Response Rates from Web and Mail Surveys: A Meta-Analysis
Field Methods,
August 1, 2008;
20(3):
249 - 271.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. E. Tower and M. G. Alkadry
The Social Costs of Career Success for Women
Review of Public Personnel Administration,
June 1, 2008;
28(2):
144 - 165.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. S. GORITZ and S. STIEGER
The high-hurdle technique put to the test: Failure to find evidence that increasing loading times enhances data quality in Web-based studies
Behav Res Methods,
February 1, 2008;
40(1):
322 - 327.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. R. Porter and M. E. Whitcomb
Mixed-Mode Contacts In Web Surveys: Paper is Not Necessarily Better
Public Opin Q,
December 1, 2007;
71(4):
635 - 648.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
B. Healey
Drop Downs and Scroll Mice: The Effect of Response Option Format and Input Mechanism Employed on Data Quality in Web Surveys
Social Science Computer Review,
February 1, 2007;
25(1):
111 - 128.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Denscombe
Web-Based Questionnaires and the Mode Effect: An Evaluation Based on Completion Rates and Data Contents of Near-Identical Questionnaires Delivered in Different Modes
Social Science Computer Review,
May 1, 2006;
24(2):
246 - 254.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. W. Patchin and S. Hinduja
Bullies Move Beyond the Schoolyard: A Preliminary Look at Cyberbullying
Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice,
April 1, 2006;
4(2):
148 - 169.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. Heerwegh
Effects of Personal Salutations in E-mail Invitations to Participate in a Web Survey
Public Opin Q,
December 1, 2005;
69(4):
588 - 598.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. R. Porter and M. E. Whitcomb
E-mail Subject Lines and Their Effect on Web Survey Viewing and Response
Social Science Computer Review,
August 1, 2005;
23(3):
380 - 387.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
N. E. Kiernan, M. Kiernan, M. A. Oyler, and C. Gilles
Is a Web Survey as Effective as a Mail Survey? A Field Experiment Among Computer Users
American Journal of Evaluation,
June 1, 2005;
26(2):
245 - 252.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Schmierbach
Method Matters: The Influence of Methodology on Journalists' Assessments of Social Science Research
Science Communication,
March 1, 2005;
26(3):
269 - 287.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. E. Whitcomb and S. R. Porter
E-Mail Contacts: A Test of Complex Graphical Designs in Survey Research
Social Science Computer Review,
August 1, 2004;
22(3):
370 - 376.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. J. Damschroder, J. Baron, J. C. Hershey, D. A. Asch, C. Jepson, and P. A. Ubel
The Validity of Person Tradeoff Measurements: Randomized Trial of Computer Elicitation Versus Face-to-Face Interview
Med Decis Making,
March 1, 2004;
24(2):
170 - 180.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. Heerwegh and G. Loosveldt
An Evaluation of the Semiautomatic Login Procedure to Control Web Survey Access
Social Science Computer Review,
May 1, 2003;
21(2):
223 - 234.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. Ballard and R. Prine
Citizen Perceptions of Community Policing: Comparing Internet and Mail Survey Responses
Social Science Computer Review,
November 1, 2002;
20(4):
485 - 493.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. Heerwegh and G. Loosveldt
Web Surveys: The Effect of Controlling Survey Access Using PIN Numbers
Social Science Computer Review,
February 1, 2002;
20(1):
10 - 21.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|
|