Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Social Science Computer Review
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Crawford, S. D.
Right arrow Articles by Lamias, M. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Web Surveys

Perceptions of Burden

Scott D. Crawford

MSInteractive, scott.crawford{at}ms-interactive.com

Mick P. Couper

University of Michigan

Mark J. Lamias

University of Michigan

Web surveys appear to be attaining lower response rates than equivalent mail surveys. One reason may be that there is currently little information on effective strategies for increasing response to Internet-based surveys. Web users are becoming more impatient with high-burden Web interactions. The authors examined the decision to respond to a Web survey by embedding a series of experiments in a survey of students at the University of Michigan. A sample of over 4,500 students was sent an e-mail invitation to participate in a Web survey on affirmative action policies. Methodological experiments included using a progress indicator, automating password entry, varying the timing of reminder notices to nonrespondents, and using a prenotification report of the anticipated survey length. Each of these experiments was designed to vary the burden (perceived or real) of the survey request. Results of these experiments are presented.

Key Words: Websurveys • surveymethodology • Internet • affirmativeaction • onlinesurveys

Social Science Computer Review, Vol. 19, No. 2, 146-162 (2001)
DOI: 10.1177/089443930101900202


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Public Opin QHome page
M. Galesic and M. Bosnjak
Effects of Questionnaire Length on Participation and Indicators of Response Quality in a Web Survey
Public Opin Q, June 1, 2009; 73(2): 349 - 360.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Public Opin QHome page
A. Peytchev
Survey Breakoff
Public Opin Q, April 2, 2009; (2009) nfp014v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
International Review of Administrative SciencesHome page
W. Vandenabeele
The mediating effect of job satisfaction and organizational commitment on self-reported performance: more robust evidence of the PSM--performance relationship
International Review of Administrative Sciences, March 1, 2009; 75(1): 11 - 34.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Sociological Methods ResearchHome page
V. Toepoel, C. Vis, M. Das, and A. van Soest
Design of Web Questionnaires: An Information-Processing Perspective for the Effect of Response Categories
Sociological Methods Research, February 1, 2009; 37(3): 371 - 392.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Public Opin QHome page
N. Malhotra
Completion Time and Response Order Effects in Web Surveys
Public Opin Q, December 23, 2008; (2008) nfn050v2.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Social Science Computer ReviewHome page
C. A. Klofstad, S. Boulianne, and D. Basson
Matching the Message to the Medium: Results from an Experiment on Internet Survey Email Contacts
Social Science Computer Review, November 1, 2008; 26(4): 498 - 509.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Field MethodsHome page
T.-H. Shih and Xitao Fan
Comparing Response Rates from Web and Mail Surveys: A Meta-Analysis
Field Methods, August 1, 2008; 20(3): 249 - 271.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Review of Public Personnel AdministrationHome page
L. E. Tower and M. G. Alkadry
The Social Costs of Career Success for Women
Review of Public Personnel Administration, June 1, 2008; 28(2): 144 - 165.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Behav Res MethodsHome page
A. S. GORITZ and S. STIEGER
The high-hurdle technique put to the test: Failure to find evidence that increasing loading times enhances data quality in Web-based studies
Behav Res Methods, February 1, 2008; 40(1): 322 - 327.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Public Opin QHome page
S. R. Porter and M. E. Whitcomb
Mixed-Mode Contacts In Web Surveys: Paper is Not Necessarily Better
Public Opin Q, December 1, 2007; 71(4): 635 - 648.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Social Science Computer ReviewHome page
B. Healey
Drop Downs and Scroll Mice: The Effect of Response Option Format and Input Mechanism Employed on Data Quality in Web Surveys
Social Science Computer Review, February 1, 2007; 25(1): 111 - 128.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Social Science Computer ReviewHome page
M. Denscombe
Web-Based Questionnaires and the Mode Effect: An Evaluation Based on Completion Rates and Data Contents of Near-Identical Questionnaires Delivered in Different Modes
Social Science Computer Review, May 1, 2006; 24(2): 246 - 254.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Youth Violence and Juvenile JusticeHome page
J. W. Patchin and S. Hinduja
Bullies Move Beyond the Schoolyard: A Preliminary Look at Cyberbullying
Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, April 1, 2006; 4(2): 148 - 169.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Public Opin QHome page
D. Heerwegh
Effects of Personal Salutations in E-mail Invitations to Participate in a Web Survey
Public Opin Q, December 1, 2005; 69(4): 588 - 598.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Social Science Computer ReviewHome page
S. R. Porter and M. E. Whitcomb
E-mail Subject Lines and Their Effect on Web Survey Viewing and Response
Social Science Computer Review, August 1, 2005; 23(3): 380 - 387.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
American Journal of EvaluationHome page
N. E. Kiernan, M. Kiernan, M. A. Oyler, and C. Gilles
Is a Web Survey as Effective as a Mail Survey? A Field Experiment Among Computer Users
American Journal of Evaluation, June 1, 2005; 26(2): 245 - 252.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Science CommunicationHome page
M. Schmierbach
Method Matters: The Influence of Methodology on Journalists' Assessments of Social Science Research
Science Communication, March 1, 2005; 26(3): 269 - 287.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Social Science Computer ReviewHome page
M. E. Whitcomb and S. R. Porter
E-Mail Contacts: A Test of Complex Graphical Designs in Survey Research
Social Science Computer Review, August 1, 2004; 22(3): 370 - 376.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Med Decis MakingHome page
L. J. Damschroder, J. Baron, J. C. Hershey, D. A. Asch, C. Jepson, and P. A. Ubel
The Validity of Person Tradeoff Measurements: Randomized Trial of Computer Elicitation Versus Face-to-Face Interview
Med Decis Making, March 1, 2004; 24(2): 170 - 180.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Social Science Computer ReviewHome page
D. Heerwegh and G. Loosveldt
An Evaluation of the Semiautomatic Login Procedure to Control Web Survey Access
Social Science Computer Review, May 1, 2003; 21(2): 223 - 234.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Social Science Computer ReviewHome page
C. Ballard and R. Prine
Citizen Perceptions of Community Policing: Comparing Internet and Mail Survey Responses
Social Science Computer Review, November 1, 2002; 20(4): 485 - 493.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Social Science Computer ReviewHome page
D. Heerwegh and G. Loosveldt
Web Surveys: The Effect of Controlling Survey Access Using PIN Numbers
Social Science Computer Review, February 1, 2002; 20(1): 10 - 21.
[Abstract] [PDF]