Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Social Science Computer Review
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pruijt, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Social Capital and the Equalizing Potential of the Internet

Hans Pruijt

Erasmus University Rotterdam, pruijt{at}fsw.eur.nl

Internet communication tends to complement real-world interaction; it does not destroy (public good) social capital. The Internet can support and enhance communities that to some extent depend on face-to-face interaction. Taking the online communication of computer professionals as a model, this article seeks to demonstrate the power of virtual communities. Examples are the development of Linux and users’ reactions to a bug in the Pentium processor. Online communication, facilitated by personal home pages and search engines, offers isolated workers opportunities for increasing their private good social capital as well. On the level of infrastructure, key characteristics of the Internet match those of social capital: the network aspect itself, cooperation, voluntary work, giving, standards of social behavior, and the fact that it is not designed. Downsides of the Internet also correspond to downsides of social capital. Realizing the equalizing potential of the Internet in terms of social capital requires action.

Key Words: Internet • social capital • computer-mediated communication • social theory

Social Science Computer Review, Vol. 20, No. 2, 109-115 (2002)
DOI: 10.1177/089443930202000201


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
New Media SocietyHome page
H. Wiklund
A Habermasian analysis of the deliberative democratic potential of ICT-enabled services in Swedish municipalities
New Media Society, October 1, 2005; 7(5): 701 - 723.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
New Media SocietyHome page
H. Wiklund
A Habermasian analysis of the deliberative democratic potential of ICT-enabled services in Swedish municipalities
New Media Society, April 1, 2005; 7(2): 247 - 270.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Information ScienceHome page
M. Thelwall and G. Harries
Can Personal Web Pages that Link to Universities Yield Information about the Wider Dissemination of Research?
Journal of Information Science, June 1, 2004; 30(3): 240 - 253.
[Abstract] [PDF]