Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Social Science Computer Review
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Miller, T. I.
Right arrow Articles by Collett, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Citizen Surveys on the Web

General Population Surveys of Community Opinion

Thomas I. Miller

National Research Center, Inc., tom{at}n-r-c.com

Michelle Miller Kobayashi

National Research Center, Inc.

Erin Caldwell

National Research Center, Inc., erin{at}n-r-c.com

Sarah Thurston

National Research Center, Inc.

Ben Collett

National Research Center, Inc.

Experiments were conducted in two cities comparing web and mail surveys seeking resident attitudes about city services, quality of community life and local policies. Web participants were recruited the same way as mail participants, through a probability sample of addresses, but web recruits were mailed the survey URL instead of the questionnaire. Response rates, respondent demographic characteristics, use of "Don’t Know" and mean responses as well as response variability were compared. Although in each city, response rates were much lower for the web participants, and web respondents had different demographic characteristics and tendencies to be opinionated compared to mail respondents, the variability and means of results were quite similar for the two survey groups. Differences between web responses and mail responses also were similar in both cities. Despite coverage limitations, web administration may have limited utility for citizen surveys where political and technical barriers can be overcome.

Key Words: survey research • Internet surveys • web surveys • city surveys • mail surveys

Social Science Computer Review, Vol. 20, No. 2, 124-136 (2002)
DOI: 10.1177/089443930202000203


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Field MethodsHome page
T.-H. Shih and Xitao Fan
Comparing Response Rates from Web and Mail Surveys: A Meta-Analysis
Field Methods, August 1, 2008; 20(3): 249 - 271.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Language and Social PsychologyHome page
K. D. Graves, J. E. Schmidt, and M. A. Andrykowski
Writing about September 11, 2001: Exploration of Emotional Intelligence and the Social Environment
Journal of Language and Social Psychology, September 1, 2005; 24(3): 285 - 299.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Social Science Computer ReviewHome page
A. R. Trouteaud
How You Ask Counts: A Test of Internet-Related Components of Response Rates to a Web-Based Survey
Social Science Computer Review, August 1, 2004; 22(3): 385 - 392.
[Abstract] [PDF]