Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Social Science Computer Review
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Heerwegh, D.
Right arrow Articles by Loosveldt, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

An Evaluation of the Effect of Response Formats on Data Quality in Web Surveys

Dirk Heerwegh

University of Leuven, Belgium, dirk.heerwegh{at}soc.kuleuven.ac.be

Geert Loosveldt

University of Leuven, Belgium, geert.loosveldt{at}soc.kuleuven.ac.be

When designing a web questionnaire, various HTML input elements can be used to register respondents’ answers. Two input elements, radio buttons and drop-down boxes, can be regarded as technically equivalent because they serve the same purpose—both allowing selection of one answer from a list of response options. However, these input elements are dissimilar in many respects, and there is reason to believe that some people are less familiar with drop-down boxes. By means of two experiments, this study evaluates the effect of the two response formats on data quality. Lower data quality was expected in the drop-down boxes condition than in the radio buttons condition. The data showed that a slight preference for radio buttons might be justified, although both response formats have benefits and drawbacks. The choice between these response formats is not self-evident and needs to be guided by other considerations such as sample composition and survey design.

Key Words: web survey • survey data quality • response formats • online research

Social Science Computer Review, Vol. 20, No. 4, 471-484 (2002)
DOI: 10.1177/089443902237323


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Social Science Computer ReviewHome page
C. A. Klofstad, S. Boulianne, and D. Basson
Matching the Message to the Medium: Results from an Experiment on Internet Survey Email Contacts
Social Science Computer Review, November 1, 2008; 26(4): 498 - 509.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Social Science Computer ReviewHome page
B. Healey
Drop Downs and Scroll Mice: The Effect of Response Option Format and Input Mechanism Employed on Data Quality in Web Surveys
Social Science Computer Review, February 1, 2007; 25(1): 111 - 128.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Social Science Computer ReviewHome page
M. Denscombe
Web-Based Questionnaires and the Mode Effect: An Evaluation Based on Completion Rates and Data Contents of Near-Identical Questionnaires Delivered in Different Modes
Social Science Computer Review, May 1, 2006; 24(2): 246 - 254.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Social Science Computer ReviewHome page
M. P. Couper
Technology Trends in Survey Data Collection
Social Science Computer Review, November 1, 2005; 23(4): 486 - 501.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Social Science Computer ReviewHome page
M. P. Couper, R. Tourangeau, F. G. Conrad, and S. D. Crawford
What They See Is What We Get: Response Options for Web Surveys
Social Science Computer Review, February 1, 2004; 22(1): 111 - 127.
[Abstract] [PDF]