This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Schonlau, M. Articles by Du, C. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Web Surveys as Part of a Mixed-Mode Strategy for Populations that cannot be Contacted by E-Mail

RAND Corporation

Beth J. Asch

RAND Corporation

Can Du

RAND Corporation

Potential respondents to web surveys are usually contacted by e-mail. For general target populations, e-mail addresses are usually not available. This study explores whether a sequential mixed-mode web/mail strategy can be used for such a population to encourage respondents to choose the web mode. In the authors' sequential mixed-mode web/mail survey, respondents were first encouraged to reply by web and in a follow-up were also offered mail questionnaires. Even though the target population (high school students) is presumed to be relatively computer savvy, the authors find that almost two thirds of the respondents nonetheless prefer responding by mail. In the first stage (when respondents can only reply on the web), phone reminders increase the number of web responses. In the second stage (when respondents may choose between responding by mail or by web), mail incentives increase the number of mail responses but do not affect the number of web responses.

Key Words: web survey • Internet survey • incentive • phone reminder • mixed mode

Social Science Computer Review, Vol. 21, No. 2, 218-222 (2003)
DOI: 10.1177/0894439303021002007


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. Schonlau, A. van Soest, A. Kapteyn, and M. Couper Selection Bias in Web Surveys and the Use of Propensity Scores Sociological Methods Research, February 1, 2009; 37(3): 291 - 318. [Abstract] [PDF]

				S. Dolnicar, C. Laesser, and K. Matus Online Versus Paper: Format Effects in Tourism Surveys Journal of Travel Research, February 1, 2009; 47(3): 295 - 316. [Abstract] [PDF]

				P. D. Converse, E. W. Wolfe, Xiaoting Huang, and F. L. Oswald Response Rates for Mixed-Mode Surveys Using Mail and E-mail/Web American Journal of Evaluation, March 1, 2008; 29(1): 99 - 107. [Abstract] [PDF]

				K. Diment and S. Garrett-Jones How Demographic Characteristics Affect Mode Preference in a Postal/Web Mixed-Mode Survey of Australian Researchers Social Science Computer Review, August 1, 2007; 25(3): 410 - 417. [Abstract] [PDF]

				S. Fricker, M. Galesic, R. Tourangeau, and T. Yan An Experimental Comparison of Web and Telephone Surveys Public Opin Q, September 1, 2005; 69(3): 370 - 392. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Schonlau, K. Zapert, L. P. Simon, K. H. Sanstad, S. M. Marcus, J. Adams, M. Spranca, H. Kan, R. Turner, and S. H. Berry A Comparison Between Responses From a Propensity-Weighted Web Survey and an Identical RDD Survey Social Science Computer Review, February 1, 2004; 22(1): 128 - 138. [Abstract] [PDF]