Social Science Computer Review

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Register here to gain access to SAGE's 500+ Journals Online

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Underhill, C.
Right arrow Articles by Olmsted, M. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Social Science Computer Review, Vol. 21, No. 4, 506-512 (2003)
DOI: 10.1177/0894439303256541

An Experimental Comparison of Computer-Mediated and Face-to-Face Focus Groups

Christina Underhill

Navy Personnel Research, Studies and Technology Department of the Navy Personnel Command, christina.underhill{at}persnet.navy.mil

Murrey G. Olmsted

Navy Personnel Research, Studies and Technology Department of the Navy Personnel Command, murrey.olmsted{at}navy.mil

Conducting focus groups via computers is becoming an increasingly popular method for collecting data. The main benefits of Internet-based focus groups include lower cost, no travel expenses, automatic capture of the discussion data, and the ability to reach remote populations for participation. Although Internet-based focus groups are popular, little research has been done to compare the quantity and quality of the information obtained from traditional face-to-face focus groups and computer-based focus groups. This study compared the quantity and quality of information gained from face-to-face and two computer-based focus group conditions. Results indicated conducting focus groups using a computer produces similar amounts of information. Most important, the quality of the information obtained from computer-based focus groups is not significantly different from information obtained from face-to-face groups. Varying the levels of social interaction to cause different levels of perceived social presence did not produce differences in the quality or quantity of information.

Key Words: computer-mediated communication • focus groups • online focus groups • face-to-face focus groups • social presence


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Social Science Computer ReviewHome page
M. Tremayne, Xin Chen, N. Figur, and J. Sonia Huang
Perceived Authority and Communication Channel: Experiments with Instant Messaging
Social Science Computer Review, May 1, 2008; 26(2): 178 - 189.
[Abstract] [PDF]