Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Social Science Computer Review
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (6)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by MacMillan, K.
Right arrow Articles by Koenig, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

The Wow Factor

Preconceptions and Expectations for Data Analysis Software in Qualitative Research

Katie MacMillan

Loughborough University k.macmillan{at}lboro.ac.uk

Thomas Koenig

Loughborough University t.koenig{at}lboro.ac.uk

Discussions on computer-assisted qualitative data analysis software often begin with the assumption that research will automatically be improved through the use of such software. Consequently, reviews frequently focus on practical concerns with the various software packages. Rather than theoretical considerations of its suitability to the method of analysis, such descriptions frequently treat software as the method of analysis. The following article calls for a clearer understanding of the role of software within research, with critical evaluation focusing on the methodological issues surrounding software use, as well on its technological innovations. The authors examine a number of factors that foster a tendency toward uncritical appraisal—including unrealistic expectations of the software as a methodology in itself; the treatment of qualitative analysis as a single, homogenized category; and the use of grounded theory as a legitimating link between tool and method.

Key Words: qualitative research • theory • grounded theory • CAQDAS • computer

Social Science Computer Review, Vol. 22, No. 2, 179-186 (2004)
DOI: 10.1177/0894439303262625
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 CirculationHome page
L. A. Curry, I. M. Nembhard, and E. H. Bradley
Qualitative and Mixed Methods Provide Unique Contributions to Outcomes Research
Circulation, March 17, 2009; 119(10): 1442 - 1452.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Social Science Computer ReviewHome page
S. Hwang
Utilizing Qualitative Data Analysis Software: A Review of Atlas.ti
Social Science Computer Review, November 1, 2008; 26(4): 519 - 527.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Social Science Computer ReviewHome page
C. H. Sin
Teamwork Involving Qualitative Data Analysis Software: Striking a Balance Between Research Ideals and Pragmatics
Social Science Computer Review, August 1, 2008; 26(3): 350 - 358.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 EvaluationHome page
C. H. Sin
Using Software to Open up the 'Black Box' of Qualitative Data Analysis in Evaluations: The Experience of a Multi-Site Team Using NUD*IST Version 6
Evaluation, January 1, 2007; 13(1): 110 - 120.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Field MethodsHome page
J. D. Bringer, L. H. Johnston, and C. H. Brackenridge
Using Computer-Assisted Qualitative Data Analysis Software to Develop a Grounded Theory Project
Field Methods, August 1, 2006; 18(3): 245 - 266.
[Abstract] [PDF]