This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (7) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Tuten, T. L. Articles by Bosnjak, M. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Effects of Immediate Versus Delayed Notification of Prize Draw Results on Response Behavior in Web Surveys

An Experiment

Virginia Commonwealth University ttryan{at}vcu.edu

Mirta Galesic

University of Maryland mgalesic{at}survey.umd.edu

Michael Bosnjak

University of Mannheim bosnjak{at}tnt.psychologie.uni-mannheim.de

Many online surveys offer the chance to win prizes as a primary incentive for respondents. One researcher found that prepaid monetary incentives were the most effective technique for increasing response rates, however, other researchers showed that a prize incentive outperformed other incentive types in a web-based survey. Using the immediacy effect and supporting theories as a base, this study extends the research on using prize draws as an effective incentive for web surveys by investigating the effects of immediate versus delayed notification for prize draw winners. Results indicate that the immediate notification of prize draw results did significantly increase response rates to the survey over the delayed notification, receipt of results, and control groups.

Key Words: web-based surveys • immediacy effect • incentives • nonresponse

Social Science Computer Review, Vol. 22, No. 3, 377-384 (2004)
DOI: 10.1177/0894439304265640


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				A. S. Goritz Building and managing an online panel with phpPanelAdmin Behav Res Methods, November 1, 2009; 41(4): 1177 - 1182. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. Galesic and M. Bosnjak Effects of Questionnaire Length on Participation and Indicators of Response Quality in a Web Survey Public Opin Q, June 1, 2009; 73(2): 349 - 360. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. Marcus, M. Bosnjak, S. Lindner, S. Pilischenko, and A. Schutz Compensating for Low Topic Interest and Long Surveys: A Field Experiment on Nonresponse in Web Surveys Social Science Computer Review, August 1, 2007; 25(3): 372 - 383. [Abstract] [PDF]

				A. S. Goritz and H.-G. Wolff Lotteries as Incentives in Longitudinal Web Studies Social Science Computer Review, February 1, 2007; 25(1): 99 - 110. [Abstract] [PDF]

				B. Healey Drop Downs and Scroll Mice: The Effect of Response Option Format and Input Mechanism Employed on Data Quality in Web Surveys Social Science Computer Review, February 1, 2007; 25(1): 111 - 128. [Abstract] [PDF]

				A. S. Goritz Cash Lotteries as Incentives in Online Panels Social Science Computer Review, November 1, 2006; 24(4): 445 - 459. [Abstract] [PDF]

				D. Heerwegh An Investigation of the Effect of Lotteries on Web Survey Response Rates Field Methods, May 1, 2006; 18(2): 205 - 220. [Abstract] [PDF]