Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!
Social Science Computer Review
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Javidi, M.
Right arrow Articles by Ivy, D. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Enhancing Focus Group Validity With Computer-Assisted Technology in Social Science Research

Mitch Javidi

Larry W. Long

Michael L. Vasu

Diana K. Ivy

The use of focus groups as a qualitative research method has received criticism, particularly concerning its lack of predictive validity. However, it has also been lauded for providing rich and in-depth information. This study sought to enhance focus group research results by combining a computer-assisted technology (Continuous Attitudinal Response Technology, CARTtm) and social scientific data collection techniques (national poll) in testing subjects' responses to Proposition 103, an insurance industry regulating initiative.1 Excerpts from television commercials, newscasts, and talk shows constituted the stimuli for focus group subjects. Results from use of the CARTtm system with focus group subjects confirmed those derived from the national poll, regarding the insurance controversy. However, processes inherent in the CARTtm technology allowed for more in-depth analysis and interpretation than the survey technique alone. Keywords: Computer, social science, continuous attitudinal response technology, survey methods, insurance, validity.

Social Science Computer Review, Vol. 9, No. 2, 231-245 (1991)
DOI: 10.1177/089443939100900204
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Family and Consumer Sciences Research JournalHome page
K. S. Keim, M. A. Swanson, S. E. Cann, and A. Salinas
Focus Group Methodology: Adapting the Process for Low-Income Adults and Children of Hispanic and Caucasian Ethnicity
Family and Consumer Sciences Research Journal, June 1, 1999; 27(4): 451 - 465.
[Abstract] [PDF]