Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Social Science Computer Review
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nickerson, D. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

The Ineffectiveness of E-Vites to Democracy

Field Experiments Testing the Role of E-Mail on Voter Turnout

David W. Nickerson

University of Notre Dame, Indiana, david.w.nickerson{at}gmail.com

Political campaigns are just now learning how to put the Internet to best use. This article conducts seven field experiments containing 161,633 participants testing whether an e-mail campaign can be effective for voter registration and mobilization. No increase in registration or turnout was detected, and the conclusion drawn is that e-mail is not currently a cost-effective means of boosting rates of registration or increasing voter turnout.

Key Words: e-mail • voter mobilization • field experiment • voter turnout

References

  • Faler, B. (2004a, February 20). Dean leaves legacy of on-line campaigning. The Washington Post, p. A12.
  • Faler, B. (2004b, December 25). Kerry's email list continues to be valuable resource. The Washington Post, p. A02.
  • Gerber, A.S., & Green, D.P. (2000). The effects of canvassing, telephone calls, and direct mail on voter turnout: A field experiment. American Political Science Review, 94, 653-663.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • Gerber, A.S., Green, D.P., & Green, M.N. (2003). The effects of partisan direct mail on voter turnout. Electoral Studies, 22, 563-579.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • Green, D.P., Gerber, A.S., & Nickerson, D.W. (2003). Getting out the vote in local elections: Results from six door-to-door canvassing experiments. Journal of Politics, 65, 1083-1096.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • Green, D.P., & Gerber, A.S. (2004). Get out the vote: How to increase voter turnout. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
  • Kim, J., & Margolis, M. (2005, October 5-7). Deploying e-mail lists in the 2004 presidential campaign: Simple enhancements or new necessities? Paper presented at the State of the Parties: 2004 & Beyond conference, Akron, OH.
  • Nagourney, A. (2006, April 2). Internet injects sweeping change into US politics. The New York Times, p. A1.
  • Nickerson, D.W. (2006). Volunteer phone calls can increase turnout: Evidence from eight field experiments. American Politics Research, 34, 271-292.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • Nickerson, D.W. (2007). Quality is job one: Professional and volunteer mobilization calls. American Journal of Political Science, 51, 269-282.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • Nickerson, D.W., Friedrichs, R.K., & King, D.C. (2006). Partisan mobilization campaigns in the field: Results from a statewide turnout experiment in Michigan. Political Research Quarterly, 59, 85-97.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • Panagopoulos, C. (n.d.). Are partisan voters more responsive to partisan or nonpartisan GOTV messages? Unpublished manuscript, Institute for Social and Policy Studies, Yale University.
  • Reich, B. (2005, February). E-strategies that worked. Campaigns and Elections, 26, 34-35.

Social Science Computer Review, Vol. 25, No. 4, 494-503 (2007)
DOI: 10.1177/0894439307305627


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nickerson, D. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?